|
Post by jayrish on Jul 17, 2010 17:45:41 GMT -5
Reeves actually went from a D to a C potential this year, while getting better at inside scoring (see below)
2001 Reeves: Bryant Reeves C 28 7'0'' 275 C+ C C- B+ B- D
New, improved 2002 Reeves: Bryant Reeves C 29 7'0'' 275 B- C C- B+ B- C
STILL looking to move this white boy ^^^
|
|
|
Post by jayrish on Jul 22, 2010 20:34:57 GMT -5
i will move bryant reeves VERY easily, to throw that out there for the night.
and also, I'm always listening, including to packages for Pierce. He's got a high price tag, but its a price tag nonetheless
|
|
|
Post by ochoseis on Jul 22, 2010 21:28:07 GMT -5
BIG COUNTRY!!!!!
Any way I can get the Truth without dealing BDiddy?
|
|
|
Post by jayrish on Jul 30, 2010 13:48:10 GMT -5
bump
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Jul 30, 2010 13:53:34 GMT -5
Nobody wants this piece of shit Why u wasting board space............
|
|
|
Post by SkRoUsE on Jul 30, 2010 14:03:35 GMT -5
I don't understand this league, A potential guy gets worse or stays the same and his potential drops to a B, D potential guy improves and his potential goes up too? WTF?
|
|
|
Post by poetic on Jul 30, 2010 14:06:16 GMT -5
You were seeing scouted potential, their actual was probably higher and that's why you're seeing the bump in potential grade.
|
|
|
Post by 20/20/20/20 on Jul 30, 2010 16:21:28 GMT -5
Plus, there is likely random fluctuation where guys get better/worse in the offseason, just like real life. Not everyone with the same potential is going to have the exact same thing happen to them.
|
|
|
Post by lulu on Jul 30, 2010 18:02:52 GMT -5
Protip: Don't put too much stock into potential as we don't know their real potential numbers, and potential over the age of 25 is worthless.
|
|