|
|
Post by ohhaithur on Nov 2, 2010 21:14:13 GMT -5
Jazz give:
2.1
2.12
Mavericks give:
They will stash Darryl Watkins at 2.1, trade the rights back
|
|
|
|
Post by dumptime on Nov 2, 2010 21:15:02 GMT -5
accept
|
|
|
|
Post by soup on Nov 2, 2010 21:31:37 GMT -5
is this even legal?
|
|
|
|
Post by poetic on Nov 2, 2010 21:48:49 GMT -5
Yes, you can trade stuff to others for free.
|
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Nov 2, 2010 21:53:21 GMT -5
Yes, you can trade stuff to others for free. I think he was asking about having someone stash a player for you as part of the agreement. Seems like bending the rules. Ohh could possibly have 4 players stashed in Europe and not use a single one of his available stash allotments |
|
|
|
Post by ohhaithur on Nov 2, 2010 21:54:24 GMT -5
Yes, you can trade stuff to others for free. I think he was asking about having someone stash a player for you as part of the agreement. Seems like bending the rules. Ohh could possibly have 4 players stashed in Europe and not use a single one of his available stash allotments Not without giving something up :idk: |
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Nov 2, 2010 22:11:13 GMT -5
I think he was asking about having someone stash a player for you as part of the agreement. Seems like bending the rules. Ohh could possibly have 4 players stashed in Europe and not use a single one of his available stash allotments Not without giving something up :idk: well in a trade normally its an exchange of players/picks back and forth. Not really the issue I think Soup or I are talking about. Th point was you seem to be bending the system by having these gm's stash players for you and them not counting as "your" stash's |
|
|
|
Post by poetic on Nov 2, 2010 22:12:04 GMT -5
Don't see anything wrong it personally.
|
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Nov 2, 2010 22:12:56 GMT -5
Don't see anything wrong it personally. OK |
|
|
|
Post by soup on Nov 3, 2010 7:23:23 GMT -5
Don't see anything wrong it personally. of course you don't. you cheat anyways.  |
|
