|
|
Post by poetic on Oct 25, 2010 6:09:53 GMT -5
1. B- B- C A+ C+ A
2. B- C+ C A C+ A
3. C+ C+ C+ A C+ A
4. C+ C+ C A+ C B
5. B- C+ C A C+ B
6. C+ C+ C+ A+ C+ C
7. C C+ C A C B
8. C+ C+ C- A C B
9. C C C A- C B
10. C C C A- C C
Buyout: 3 million 1st year.
|
|
|
|
Post by rv12 on Oct 25, 2010 8:01:42 GMT -5
Wow at 1 and 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by 20/20/20/20 on Oct 25, 2010 8:44:43 GMT -5
Well, he's going to have good defense.
|
|
|
|
Post by ohhaithur on Oct 25, 2010 9:08:27 GMT -5
Original ratings: C+ C+ C A C B
|
|
|
|
Post by rv12 on Oct 25, 2010 9:18:45 GMT -5
Original ratings: C+ C+ C A C B Didn't realize he started with A defense. |
|
|
|
Post by ohhaithur on Oct 25, 2010 9:30:21 GMT -5
Original ratings: C+ C+ C A C B Didn't realize he started with A defense. That's why I looked it up. Bankz took him #2 too. Now that we've seen the ratings we can debate the pick imo. He took him over Bogut and Marvin Williams. Right now it looks like there's only a 30% chance (1-3) that he was worth the #2 pick while #2 picks have had much better success than that progressing naturally. Even if he hits #1 I'm still not a fan of the move. |
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Oct 25, 2010 13:28:20 GMT -5
Not bad....... Not bad at all...........
Going to instantly upgrade my D.
|
|
|
|
Post by clown on Oct 25, 2010 15:50:42 GMT -5
They've progressed naturally, but they also are using up their rookie contract years.
|
|
|
|
Post by rv12 on Oct 25, 2010 15:54:59 GMT -5
They've progressed naturally, but they also are using up their rookie contract years. Huh? You still get a 4 year rookie deal when they come back. |
|
|
|
Post by 20/20/20/20 on Oct 25, 2010 18:50:01 GMT -5
They've progressed naturally, but they also are using up their rookie contract years. Huh? You still get a 4 year rookie deal when they come back. He is saying that while the regular #2 picks have progressed more than Koralev, they also are using up 2 years of their rookie deals. Therefore, if Koralev had progressed just as much as most #2 picks and still had a 4 year rookie deal coming, it would be even more of an advantage. |
|
|
|
Post by clown on Oct 25, 2010 18:50:10 GMT -5
They've progressed naturally, but they also are using up their rookie contract years. Huh? You still get a 4 year rookie deal when they come back. That's what I meant, should have clarified. Was responding to Ohh talking about the other #2 picks progressing naturally. |
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Oct 25, 2010 21:40:46 GMT -5
Yeah if I hit a the top 2 (unlikely) Korolev would be a fucking monster. And on a 4 year deal.
If I avoid about 3 rolls I would say my gamble payed off.
|
|
|
|
Post by rv12 on Oct 25, 2010 22:18:23 GMT -5
Huh? You still get a 4 year rookie deal when they come back. He is saying that while the regular #2 picks have progressed more than Koralev, they also are using up 2 years of their rookie deals. Therefore, if Koralev had progressed just as much as most #2 picks and still had a 4 year rookie deal coming, it would be even more of an advantage. My bad. I completely misunderstood. |
|
|
|
Post by poetic on Oct 31, 2010 16:34:04 GMT -5
Pick a number. Will do these guys tonight after lotto.
|
|
|
|
Post by rv12 on Oct 31, 2010 16:46:41 GMT -5
I'm going with 4.
|
|
