|
|
Post by bankz on Oct 6, 2010 0:22:50 GMT -5
70% chance of improvement? No way. There should be no set standard, not all 1st rounders are created equal. and for 2nd rounders the odds of improving should be pretty slim, they were 2nd rounders for a reason I mean those are numbers that I am putting out there. How would you determine what rookies should get more % of improving? |
|
|
|
Post by zeropointzero on Oct 6, 2010 3:57:02 GMT -5
Its a case by case basis, the whole point of stashing players overseas isn't to turn this into one big game of roulette where everybody drafts foreigners in the 2nd round knowing they have a __% chance at turning them into huge steals. Same goes for the HS'ers in the 1st round. It sets a bad precedent if the 5th pick overall in the draft has the same chance of improving as the 25th pick.
Smith was an infinitely better prospect than this guy, his only real weakness was his outside scoring. Mr. Pork Fried Rice on the other hand either flat out sucks or is mediocre in every category other than defense, and playing 2 extra years in the Chinese league ain't gonna make him that much better for the NBA
|
|
|
|
Post by 20/20/20/20 on Oct 6, 2010 7:21:46 GMT -5
Smith was an incredibly raw boom or bust type guy. Therefore, we decided to give him some ratings where he "boomed" due to his incredible potential and some ratings on the other end of the spectrum where he was a complete bust.
Smith also didn't have an 80% chance to improve. Ian was including where his ratings go up and his potential goes down (but it is still only 70%). If you include those for Jin, he has a 40% chance to improve.
"5. C+ C- C B B- B
6. C C- C B B- B
7. B- C C- C+ B- B
8. C+ C+ C+ C+ C A"
#8 was his original ratings. With Ian's % 5, 6, & 7 are counted as improvements for Smith... those are 2nd round ratings right there so I'm not sure if they are improvements.
|
|
|
|
Post by ianboyd on Oct 6, 2010 7:27:43 GMT -5
His initial ratings were actually a bit worse than the #8 option 20x4. That's why i counted it as an improvement category too
|
|
|
|
Post by 20/20/20/20 on Oct 6, 2010 8:00:00 GMT -5
His initial ratings were actually a bit worse than the #8 option 20x4. That's why i counted it as an improvement category too Oh, my bad. I thought those were his initial ones. |
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Oct 8, 2010 21:29:31 GMT -5
3m is a bit high for the buy out considering what the new rookies buy out looks like..........
|
|
|
|
Post by ianboyd on Oct 8, 2010 22:37:55 GMT -5
2.95 of those goes to the Chinese government
|
|
|
|
Post by zeropointzero on Oct 8, 2010 22:38:41 GMT -5
Rookie buyouts and stash buyouts are different
|
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Oct 9, 2010 0:51:30 GMT -5
Rookie buyouts and stash buyouts are different ok |
|
|
|
Post by poetic on Oct 10, 2010 19:33:46 GMT -5
Bump, would like to do these guys tomorrow night before or after the lotto.
All you have to do is pick a number.
Everyone else can play along again if they want.
|
|
|
|
Post by 20/20/20/20 on Oct 10, 2010 19:35:47 GMT -5
PICK 4! CHINESE PEOPLE HATE THE NUMBER 4
|
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Oct 10, 2010 19:36:33 GMT -5
So I just post the number in this thread?
gosh I have no idea what number to go with.
|
|
|
|
Post by ohhaithur on Oct 10, 2010 19:38:29 GMT -5
I'm going for 10 each time. That way I can open my email and slowly scroll down and cross off the one's that aren't ten. I like the nervous.
|
|
|
|
Post by poetic on Oct 10, 2010 19:38:54 GMT -5
Gonna be harder for you with the number than Trofie had since there isn't as many good options.
|
|
|
|
Post by ianboyd on Oct 10, 2010 20:41:30 GMT -5
PICK 4! CHINESE PEOPLE HATE THE NUMBER 4 Chinese people don't hate it, it's just frowned upon because it is pronounced the same way "die" is. /themoreyouknow |
|
