|
|
Post by poetic on Oct 5, 2010 15:21:07 GMT -5
Here's another guy coming from over seas this year. Bulls have rights to. Here's his potential ratings:
1 - B- D+ D+ B C+ A
2 - C+ D D- B C A
3 - C D F+ B C A
4 - C+ D F+ B C B
5 - C+ D D- B C B
6 - C+ D F+ B- C B
7 - C C- D B- C+ B
8 - C+ D F+ B C C
9 - C D F+ B C C
10 - C- D F+ C+ C C
Buyout: 3 million broken up however the team likes over 2 seasons.
Rookie Contract:
Year 1 = $332,817
Year 2 = $465,850
|
|
|
|
Post by jayrish on Oct 5, 2010 15:39:16 GMT -5
PG?
|
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Oct 5, 2010 15:43:33 GMT -5
C My Russian comes out next year...... |
|
|
|
Post by ohhaithur on Oct 5, 2010 15:49:36 GMT -5
Looks about right
|
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Oct 5, 2010 15:53:22 GMT -5
So how does this work again?
You make 10 rolls.
Then I pick a number?
Sorry didn't follow Darko so I have no clue how this will go.
|
|
|
|
Post by poetic on Oct 5, 2010 15:57:39 GMT -5
I use the random draft order generator on fftoolbox making those 10 options teams. I attach our email addresses, you pick a number, I hit generate and it emails the list to us. Whatever rating is in the number slot you picked = his ratings.
|
|
trofie
General Manager
Milwaukee Bucks
Posts: 222
|
Post by trofie on Oct 5, 2010 16:45:39 GMT -5
I use the random draft order generator on fftoolbox making those 10 options teams. I attach our email addresses, you pick a number, I hit generate and it emails the list to us. Whatever rating is in the number slot you picked = his ratings. what were his initial ratings? |
|
|
|
Post by zeropointzero on Oct 5, 2010 16:53:05 GMT -5
I use the random draft order generator on fftoolbox making those 10 options teams. I attach our email addresses, you pick a number, I hit generate and it emails the list to us. Whatever rating is in the number slot you picked = his ratings. what were his initial ratings? #3 |
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Oct 5, 2010 20:30:20 GMT -5
so 20% chance he got better in 2 years.
cool
|
|
|
|
Post by rv12 on Oct 5, 2010 21:09:50 GMT -5
same for Smith bankz.
|
|
|
|
Post by ianboyd on Oct 5, 2010 21:22:59 GMT -5
lol what?
Josh Smith's 8 roll = his initial stats, that = 20% chance that he'll be worse
|
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Oct 5, 2010 22:06:50 GMT -5
lol what? Josh Smith's 8 roll = his initial stats, that = 20% chance that he'll be worse Explain this? Smith had a 80% chance of getting better vs 20% worse? |
|
|
|
Post by ianboyd on Oct 5, 2010 22:16:55 GMT -5
poe hates yellows
|
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Oct 5, 2010 22:35:26 GMT -5
Smith was a 1st rounder. But I agree I think he should have at least a 40% chance of improving. I think: 1st round stashed players should have a 70 % chance of improvement 2nd round stashed players should have 40% chance of improvement. I say this with players potential being A. You could lower % depending on Potential grade. I think setting a standard would help Poetic and who ever down the road with other players. But like I said I am cool with what ever the rolls are. I trust in Poetic so......... |
|
|
|
Post by zeropointzero on Oct 5, 2010 23:34:01 GMT -5
70% chance of improvement? No way. There should be no set standard, not all 1st rounders are created equal.
and for 2nd rounders the odds of improving should be pretty slim, they were 2nd rounders for a reason
|
|
