|
|
Post by bankz on Aug 12, 2010 17:32:35 GMT -5
What is done is done. Nothing we can do at this point. But I think the entire league can agree moving forward we need a trade commission.
I don't think every trade should go to the board. But deals like Duncan and ZO should be. When there is league wide outrage something needs to be done.
So I am recommending that we set up a 3 man board. With two alternatives just in case 1 or 2 members are part of a deal under consideration.
I think Poetic, 20/20/20/20, Matt should be the thee on the board. Then have w2d and zpz as alternatives.
But clearly something needs to be done.
|
|
|
|
Post by dumptime on Aug 12, 2010 17:32:07 GMT -5
20/20/20/20, poetic, Matt, jsirr13 should be on the board
|
|
|
|
Post by 20/20/20/20 on Aug 12, 2010 17:49:52 GMT -5
I'm personally against this, but if we do have one, this is how my baseball sim did it:
When a trade is agreed to in the completed trades, any owner was able to post "veto" as a reply if they truly thought the deal should not go through. If a single trade got 3 "veto" responses within 24 hours (league only simmed 3 times a week so we could adjust this for ours), then that deal was sent to the trade committee.
When a deal was sent to the trade committee, both owners had 12 hours to post their reasoning/thought process behind making the deal.
The trade committee members would then review the reasoning, and cast their vote. If they thought it sounded like the person had a plan and knew what they were getting into with the move, the trade passed. If cheating/collusion was not suspected, a trade generally passed.
The thing I worry about when vetoing trades and trade committees come into play is that people get trigger happy with a VETO. If this were to become part of the league, I would want people to realize how rare it should be that a deal gets sent to the trade committee.
Non-mods that I would trust/think would make good, unbiased, and well reasoned people to be on the committee: jayrish, w2d, zeropointzero, ohhaithur
|
|
|
|
Post by poetic on Aug 12, 2010 17:57:03 GMT -5
I like the trade committee idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by ianboyd on Aug 12, 2010 18:03:03 GMT -5
Who better than Kahn to make rational, well reasoned decisions on trades?
|
|
|
|
Post by jsirr13 on Aug 13, 2010 0:16:49 GMT -5
I'll definitely be on the trade board if another opinion is needed.
|
|
|
|
Post by rv12 on Aug 13, 2010 0:23:47 GMT -5
I should definitely be in the committee. I know a thing or two about lopsided trades.
|
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Aug 13, 2010 0:33:08 GMT -5
I should definitely be in the committee. I know a thing or two about lopsided trades. So does dump........ |
|
|
|
Post by rv12 on Aug 13, 2010 0:52:16 GMT -5
I should definitely be in the committee. I know a thing or two about lopsided trades. So does dump........ Naw. Dump doesn't realize when one side is getting trounced. I do. Vote for me. Vote for the King of Trades. |
|
|
|
Post by poetic on Aug 13, 2010 6:49:46 GMT -5
You have nothing to brag about taking advantage of people. You would never pull that crap on a competent GM.
|
|
|
|
Post by mj on Aug 13, 2010 9:49:40 GMT -5
Yeah this shit is beyond ridiculous
|
|
trofie
General Manager
Milwaukee Bucks
Posts: 222
|
Post by trofie on Aug 13, 2010 11:21:09 GMT -5
This could easily get out of hand. You're going to have faggots vetoing trades all the time. How is anyone ever going to win a trade?
|
|
|
|
Post by mj on Aug 13, 2010 11:22:21 GMT -5
This could easily get out of hand. You're going to have faggots vetoing trades all the time. How is anyone ever going to win a trade? Yeah the problem is what yu said but that people don't have to be accountable for their trades. In real life they are shit canned |
|
|
|
Post by poetic on Aug 13, 2010 11:30:05 GMT -5
I think people should see the difference between veto type trades and not.
Duncan and Mourning = Veto Trades.
I think it's good to have some kind of system to prevent the outrage we've seen from both trades.
|
|
|
|
Post by 20/20/20/20 on Aug 13, 2010 11:32:36 GMT -5
This could easily get out of hand. You're going to have faggots vetoing trades all the time. How is anyone ever going to win a trade? Yeah, that is the concern I would have too and why I don't like vetoing/trade control in leagues like this. That is just why it would be important to choose reasonable people to be on the trade committee. I know it would be very hard to make a trade I would veto. |
|
