|
Post by ohhaithur on Sept 29, 2010 17:31:29 GMT -5
I used my player ratings and created a weighting system to determine player importance. I found roughly 40% of the points/rebounds/assists come from the two most important players on each team. As you go down in player importance (even among starters) their impact goes down.
I then tried to do my own Pythagorean formula for wins/losses (stat nerds will know what I mean) using these totals.
My result is kinda simple, but these formulas took me over two hours to perfect. The final records aren't exact matches since rounding took place, but nobody lost more than .2 wins.
Also, you bastards making trades today fucked with this whole thing. But I edited it still.
I bolded playoff teams.
1 SAC 56.7 - 25.3 2 BOS 55.0 - 27.0 3 MIL 51.6 - 30.4 4 SEA 48.6 - 33.4 5 TOR 47.7 - 34.3 6 HOU 47.3 - 34.7 7 MIA 47.3 - 34.7 8 MIN 47.0 - 35.0 9 PHI 46.4 - 35.6 10 PHO 46.4 - 35.6 11 NYK 44.5 - 37.5 12 DEN 43.6 - 38.4 13 CHA 40.9 - 41.1 14 GS 40.1 - 41.9 15 UTA 39.8 - 42.2 16 DET 39.5 - 42.5 17 SAS 39.5 - 42.5 18 DAL 39.2 - 42.8 19 ATL 38.4 - 43.6 20 CHI 36.7 - 45.3 21 MEM 36.2 - 45.8 22 LAL 35.4 - 46.6 23 ORL 35.4 - 46.6 24 IND 35.1 - 46.9 25 CLE 34.3 - 47.7 26 NJN 32.2 - 49.8 27 LAC 32.0 - 50.0 28 POR 31.7 - 50.3 29 WAS 19.2 - 62.8 Total 1187.9 - 1190.1
|
|
|
Post by ianboyd on Sept 29, 2010 17:35:15 GMT -5
dump not in the playoffs?
5
|
|
|
Post by dumptime on Sept 29, 2010 17:39:28 GMT -5
dump not in the playoffs? 5
|
|
|
Post by ohhaithur on Sept 29, 2010 18:10:29 GMT -5
Three 3's?
I knew I should have just typed :song: for a half hour instead of trying something new and exciting.
|
|
|
Post by heel7tiger on Sept 29, 2010 18:27:27 GMT -5
Voted 5 I like it a lot but dont expect to hav the most wins. Expect the celtics to take that.
|
|
|
Post by ohhaithur on Sept 29, 2010 18:55:31 GMT -5
Voted 5 I like it a lot but dont expect to hav the most wins. Expect the celtics to take that. Your being #1 has a ton to do with my research about importance of the top guys. Your top two are the best in the league.
|
|
|
Post by 20/20/20/20 on Sept 29, 2010 19:06:28 GMT -5
Below .500, fuck yeah
|
|
|
Post by jayrish on Sept 29, 2010 19:14:37 GMT -5
was the hypotenuse wins or losses? 5
|
|
|
Post by ohhaithur on Sept 29, 2010 19:39:10 GMT -5
Still above average . I swear, I don't hate you or your team, just my projections work out that way.
|
|
|
Post by dumptime on Sept 29, 2010 19:49:43 GMT -5
your projections suck
|
|
|
Post by bankz on Sept 29, 2010 19:51:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by heel7tiger on Sept 29, 2010 19:58:30 GMT -5
Voted 5 I like it a lot but dont expect to hav the most wins. Expect the celtics to take that. Your being #1 has a ton to do with my research about importance of the top guys. Your top two are the best in the league. Hmm I like the sound o that. I hope I do have the top 2.
|
|
|
Post by irush on Oct 12, 2010 11:08:22 GMT -5
lolol
|
|
|
Post by ohhaithur on Oct 12, 2010 11:11:58 GMT -5
Outside you, LAC, and TOR (who everyone expected to be in the playoffs) it really isn't bad :idk:
|
|
|
Post by rv12 on Oct 12, 2010 11:21:21 GMT -5
And the fact you had Detroit has a playoff team
|
|